EEG Indices of Task Engagement

Authors

  • A Kamzanova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • G Matthews Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • A Kustubayeva Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Keywords:

brain activity, EEG, task engagement, vigilance task

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of a range of EEG indices to time-on-task effects and to a workload manipulation (cueing), during performance of a resource-limited vigilance task. Effects of task period and cueing on performance and subjective state response were consistent with previous vigilance studies and with resource theory. Two EEG indices – the Task Load Index (TLI) and global lower frequency (LF) alpha power – showed effects of task period and cueing similar to those seen with correct detections. Across four successive task periods, the TLI declined and LF alpha power increased. Cueing increased TLI and decreased LF alpha. Other indices – the Engagement Index (EI), frontal theta and upper frequency (UF) alpha failed to show these effects. However, EI and frontal theta were sensitive to interactive effects of task period and cueing, which may correspond to a stronger anxiety response to the uncued task

References

1 1.Humphreys M.S., Revelle W. Personality, motivation and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing // Psychological Review, 91, P. 153-184, 1984.
2 2. Warm J.S., Dember W.N. Tests of a vigilance taxonomy // Viewing psychology as a whole: The integrative science of Dember
W.N., Hoffman R.R., Sherrick M.F. & Warm J.S. Ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1998, P. 87-112.
3 3. Reinerman L.E., Matthews G., Warm J.S., Langheim L.K., Parsons K., Proctor C.A., Siraj T., Tripp L.D. & Stutz R.M.
Cerebral blood flow velocity and task engagement as predictors of vigilance performance // Proceedings of the Human Factors and
Ergonomics Society, 50, P. 1254-1258, 2006.
4 4. Lubar J.F., Swartwood M.O., Swartwood J.N., O’Donnell P.H. Evaluation of the effectiveness of EEG neurofeedback training for ADHD in a clinical setting as measured by changes in T.O.V.A. scores, behavioral ratings, and WISC-R performance //Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 20, P. 83–99, 1995.
5 5. Offenloch K., Zahner G. Computer aided physiological assessment of the functional state of pilots during simulated flight //NATO Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development—Conference Proceedings, vol. 490, P. 1–9, 1990.
6 6. Pope E., Bogart D. Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement // Biological Psychology, 40, P. 187–196,
1995.
7 7. Freeman F.G., Mikulka P.J., Prinzel L.J. & Scerbo M.W. Evaluation of an adaptive automation system using three EEG indices with a visual tracking task // Biological Psychology, 50, P. 61–76, 1999.
8 8. Berka D.J., Levendowski M.N., Lumicao Yau A., Davis G., Zivkovic V.T., Olmstead R. E., Tremoulet P.D., Craven P.L. EEG
Correlates of Task Engagement and Mental Workload in Vigilance, Learning, and Memory Tasks // Aviation, Space, and Environmental
Medicine, vol. 78, no. 5, P. 231-244, May 2007.
9 9. Gevins M.E., Smith L., McEvoy D.Yu. High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects
of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice // Cerebral Cortex, 7, P. 374–85, 1997.
10 10. Fairclough S.H., Venables L. Tattersall The influence of task demand and learning on the psychophysiological respons //
International J of Psychophysiology, 56, P. 171– 184, 2005.
11 11. Holm K., Lukander J., Korpela M., Sallinen K.M., Müller I. Estimating brain load from the EEG // TheScientificWorld J,
vol. 9, P. 639-651, 2009.
12 12. Nassef А., Mahfouf M., Linkens D.A., Elsamahy E., Roberts A., Nickel P., Hockey G.R.J., Panoutsos G. The Assessment of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and Task Load Index (TLI) // Physiological Markers for Physical Stress,” in 2009 IFMBE Proc., P. 146–149.
13 13. Yamada F. Frontal midline theta rhythm and eyeblinking activity during a VDT task and a video game: useful tools for psychophysiology in ergonomics // Ergonomics, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 678-688, 1998.
14 14. Klimesch W. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis // Brain
Research Reviews, 29, P. 169-195, 1999.
15 15. Hitchcock E.M., Dember W.N., Warm J.S., Moroney B.W., See J.E. Effects of cueing and knowledge of results on workload and boredom in sustained attention // Human Factors. vol. 41, P. 365–372, 1999.
16 16. Hockey G.R.J., Nickel P., Roberts A.C., Roberts M.H. Sensitivity of candidate markers of psychophysiological strain to cyclical changes in manual control load during simulated process control // Applied Ergonomics, 40, P. 1011–1018, 2009

Downloads