THE MAIN DIRECTIONS OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF INTEGRATION EFFECTS IN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION IN THE CONDITIONS OF GLOBAL CHALLENGES

Abstract

Abstract.This article considers the strategic directions of economic development of the member states of the
Eurasian Economic Union, based on available resources and objective opportunities for their joint effective use.
With all the turbulence and uncertainty that exist today in the world economy, the definition of the main directions
for the coordination of economic policies looks extremely important and timely. In general, by 2030, the results of
the economic development of the EAEU have to show the world competitiveness of the integration association. In
the 2030s, the economic development of the EAEU would be possible to overcome the competitive advantages of
integration integration. The Customs Union of Kazakhstan, Belarus and Russia is a logical breakthrough from the
Eurasian Economic Community. Established in 2000 in the format of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia and
Tadjikistan – a momentous moment in the practice of the Eurasian integration. For all 11 years EurAsEC has been
shaped by the mechanism of differentiation of mechanisms in the integration process. By the way, they do not just
become intergovernmental, but also by initiative entrepreneurs, educators, education and culture, NGOs, and youth.
With the help of the global financial and economic crisis, the creation of the Eurasian bank was undermined by the anti
crisis. Kazakhstan considers Eurasia Union as an open project. Его нельзя
предстaвить без междунaродному
общественности,
нaпример,
с Евросоюзом,
with other convergence. Astana observes that the Euroasian Soyuz propiska is
a defensive part of the Chinese definition of economic expansion.
Key words: ЕАEU, integration effects, Eurasian integration.